High CourtsSingle Bench

Faruk Ansari @ Farukh Ansari vs State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 2 March 2021 · Citation: (2021) 03 JH CK 0023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anil Kumar Choudhary, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 120B, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 · Information Technology Act, 2000 — Section 66(B), 66(C), 66(D), 84(C)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 2061 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 457 words

Heard the parties through video conferencing.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown is over.

In view of personal undertaking given by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the

present.

The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No.69 of 2020 registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471,

120(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66 (B), 66 (C), 66 (D) and 84 (C) of the Information Technology Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is an infamous cyber-criminal and from his

possession six mobile phones with SIM Cards, three ATM Cards and one Scorpio vehicle have been recovered and petitioner by committing cyber-

crime, has cheated Ram Hari Mina, Raghuwar Chaupal and Anand Babu. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further

submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner. It is then submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate

with the trial of the case and undertakes to pay ad interim victim compensation of Rs.12,000/- i.e. in shape of three demand drafts out of which one of

Rs.7,000/- drawn in favour of Ram Hari Mina another of Rs.1,000/- drawn in favour of Raghuwar Chaupal and last one of Rs.4,000/- drawn in in

favour of Anand Babu without prejudice to his defence in this case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 25.10.2020

which is evident from para-11 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.

Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts of this case, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on depositing three demand drafts out of which one of

Rs.7,000/- drawn in favour of Ram Hari Mina another of Rs.1,000/- drawn in favour of Raghuwar Chaupal and last one of Rs.4,000/- drawn in favour

of Anand Babu as ad interim victim compensation without prejudice to his defence in this case and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees

twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar in connection with

Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No.69 of 2020 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case.

In case the petitioner deposits the said demand drafts, the court below is directed to collect the detailed postal addresses of the aforesaid victims and

send the demand drafts through speed post to them.