High CourtsSingle Bench

Farzana Bano And Others vs Mohammad Rizwan And Others

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 19 August 2023 · Citation: (2023) 08 RAJ CK 0059

HON’BLE JUDGES
Madan Gopal Vyas, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Section 24 · Family Courts Act, 1984 — Section 7 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 125 · Protection Of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 — Section 12
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Transfer Appeal No. 8, 9 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 398 words

Madan Gopal Vyas, J

1.

The present transfer petitions under Section 24 of CPC have been preferred by the petitioner-wives for transferring the case Nos. 488/2022 (Mohd. Rizwan Vs. Smt. Farzana Bano) and 487/2022 (Mohd. Ismile Vs Smt. Mehrun Bano) preferred by the respondents herein for restitution of conjugal rights read with Section 7 of the Family Courts Act from Family Court No.1, Jodhpur to Family Court Merta, District Nagaur.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners have preferred applications under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. before the Family Court, Merta, District Nagaur and another application under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act before the court of ACJM No.2, Merta and the same are pending consideration before the aforesaid Courts. However, in order harass and humiliate the petitioner, the respondents have preferred applications for restitution of conjugal rights before the learned Family Court No.1, Jodhpur. Thus it is prayed that applications for restitution of conjugal rights may be transferred from Family Court No.1, Jodhpur to Family Court, Merta, District Nagaur.

3.

Learned counsel appearing for respondents opposes the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners.

4.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Vinisha Jitesh Tolani @ Manmeet Laghmani vs Jitesh Kishore Tolani 2010(1) WLC (SC) 705 has observed that in the matrimonial proceedings initiated by the husband against the wife the convenience of the wife has to be considered for contesting the suit, and accordingly the matrimonial proceedings ought to be transferred where the wife is residing.

5.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to transfer the applications for restitution of conjugal rights from Family Court No.1, Jodhpur to the Family Court, Merta, District Nagaur.

6.

The transfer petitions are allowed accordingly.

7.

It is ordered that the case Nos.488/2022(Mohd. Rizwan Vs. Smt. Farzana Bano) and 487/2022 (Mohd. Ismile Vs Smt. Mehrun Bano) pending before the Family Court No.1, Jodhpur be transferred to the Family Court, Merta, District Nagaur.

8.

The learned Family Court No.1, Jodhpur is directed to send the record of the case to Family Court, Merta, District Nagaur.

9.

Both the parties are directed to appear before Family Court, Merta, District Nagaur on 4.9.2023.

10.

Learned Family Court, Merta, District Nagaur is directed to expedite the trial of the case preferably within a period of six months from today.