High CourtsSingle Bench

Faslu Rahman Soorppil vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 10 November 2021 · Citation: (2021) 11 KL CK 0070

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shircy V, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 379 · Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001 — Section 20, 23
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Appl. No. 8181 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 503 words

Shircy V, J

1.

Application for pre-arrest bail.

2.

The petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.488 of 2021 of Kalapakancherry Police Station, Malappuram District registered for the offences punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code r/w Section 20 & 23 of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001.

3.

The prosecution case is that on 17.10.2021, the S.I of police, Kalapakancherry police station found the petitioner illegally transporting river sand in a Mini lorry bearing Registration No.KL-17-D-4591 without any pass violating the conditions and restrictions prescribed under the Act. On seeing the police, the petitioner fled away from the spot, so he could not be apprehended then and there, though the vehicle was seized for illegal removal of river sand. Thereby, the petitioner has committed the aforesaid offences.

4.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well the learned Public Prosecutor.

5.

According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, he has not committed the offences as alleged by the prosecution. Though he is the driver of the vehicle, he is totally innocent of the allegations levelled against him. But he apprehends unnecessary arrest and hence, this application.

6.

The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that the vehicle was seized by the police with river sand. Though, the petitioner was engaged with illegal removal of the sand from the river, he could not be arrested as he fled away from the spot abandoning the vehicle. Now the investigation of the case is going on smoothly.

7.

The petitioner is having no criminal antecedents. Moreover, I could not find any materials available on record to infer that custodial interrogation of this petitioner is quite necessary for the prosecution to proceed with the investigation of the case. Such being the case, I think that this application can be disposed of directing the petitioner to surrender before the investigating officer. Therefore, the petitioner shall surrender before the Investigating Officer on 17.11.2021 between 10 am and 11.30 a.m. Upon his surrender, after interrogation and recording his arrest, he shall be released on bail subject to the following conditions :-

(i) The petitioner shall be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the investigating officer.

(ii) He shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation as and when required by him, in writing.

(iii) He shall co-operate with the investigation and trial of the case.

(iv) He shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

(v) He shall not commit any offence while on bail.

In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law.