High CourtsSingle Bench

Finera Trading DMCC vs MV Lucent

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 20 November 2020 · Citation: (2020) 11 GUJ CK 0030

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhargav D. Karia, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
R/Admiralty Suit No. 43 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

42 paragraphs · 744 words

Bhargav D. Karia, J

1.

Heard learned advocate Ms. Paurami B. Sheth for the plaintiff through video conference.

2.

Learned Advocate Ms. Paurami Sheth, mentioned this matter for urgent circulation today. The permission is granted for urgent circulation and suit

is taken up for hearing for urgent interim orders.

3.

Learned Advocate Ms. Paurami Sheth submitted that as per the request on behalf of the Defendant Vessel and her Owner, the Plaintiff supplied

Bunkers to the defendant Vessel, that the Plaintiff had supplied bunkers to the faith and credit of the Vessel, that the said Bunkers were accepted

without any protest, that the plaintiff raised two Invoices to which the payment was not sent on time, that the plaintiff sent reminders, that the

Defendant Vessel Owner sent part payment but not paid interest for delayed payment, that as per General Terms and Conditions, the plaintiff

appropriated the said payment towards interest and cost and thereupon intimated about outstanding amount but no payment is made till date, that the

plaintiff has maritime claim and contractual lien and for the purpose the Plaintiff is constrained to file the present Suit and interÂalia prayed for arrest

of the Defendant Vessel.

4.

Upon hearing Ms. Paurami Sheth, Learned Advocate for the Plaintiff and upon reading the plaint herein signed at Ahmedabad on 20.11.2020 filed

by the advocate for the Plaintiff herein and the affidavit of Mr. Raju Desai, authorized representative of the Plaintiff above named declared on

20.11.2020 and upon hearing counsel for the plaintiff and upon the Plaintiff giving an undertaking in writing to the Registrar of this Court to pay such

sums by way of damages as this Court may award as compensation in the event of the defendants sustaining prejudice by this order, I do order that

the Registrar of this Court do issue a warrant for the arrest of the Defendant Vessel MV LUCENT (IMO No. 9142215) along with her hull, engines,

gears, tackles, bunkers, machinery, apparel, plant, furnitures, equipments and all appurtenances, at present lying at Deendayal Port, Kandla within the

Indian territorial waters and that the Warrant of Arrest be executed at any time of the day or night or on Sundays or holidays and I do further order

that the Port Officer and the Customs Authorities at Deendayal Port, Kandla do effect the arrest, seizure or detention of the defendant Vessel MV

LUCENT at present lying Deendayal Port, Kandla within the Indian territorial waters or such other place wherever she may be within the territorial

waters of India and I do further order that in the event of the defendant and/ or those interested in her depositing in this Court the principal amount of

USD 188,437.25 and USD 20,000 for cost of litigation in India aggregating USD 208,437.25 with further interest at the rate of 5% per month on USD

188,437.25 from date of suit till its realization as per particulars of claim, the said Warrant of Arrest shall not be executed against the defendant Vessel

at present lying at Deendayal Port, Kandla within the Indian territorial waters.

5.

The Port Officer and the Customs Authorities at Deendayal Port, Kandla are directed to arrest the Defendant Vessel to be at Deendayal Port,

Kandla within the Indian territorial waters and to keep the vessel under arrest until further orders of this Court. It is further ordered that the Port

Officer and the Customs Officer at Deendayal Port, Kandla shall also intimate about this order to the Master/Chief Engineer of the Defendant Vessel

through her Agent and effect the warrant of arrest for the Defendant Vessel through email.

6.

Looking to the present situation, the Registry is directed to send this order to Port and Customs at Deendayal Port, Kandla through Email at

following addresses and the Authorities at Deendayal Port, Kandla shall act on Email copy of the order and take the Defendant Vessel under arrest.

a . dydirector@deendayalport.gov.in

b. harbourmaster@deendayalport.gov.in

c. dyconservator@deendayalport.gov.in

d. srdydirector@deendayalport.gov.in

e. dycvo@deendayalport.gov.in

f. vo@deendayalport.gov.in

g. kandlacustoms@gmail.com

h. hmofficekpt@gmail.com

7.

It is also open for the plaintiff's advocate to communicate the above order by Email at their own cost and the Port and Customs authorities are

directed to act on Email message with an ordinary copy of this order.

8.

Notice to the Defendants returnable on 24th November, 2020. It is made clear that it will be open for the Defendant to approach this Court even

prior to the returnable date with an adequate notice to the plaintiff.