AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
16 paragraphs · 347 wordsAjay Mohan Goel, J
1.By way of this contempt petition, the petitioner alleges willful disobedience of the directions passed by the erstwhile learned Himachal Pradesh
Administrative Tribunal in OA No. 2563 of 2017, titled as Finoo Ram Vs. Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited and others, which original
application stood disposed of by the learned Tribunal in the following terms:
“4. In view of the above, the present original application is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to extend the benefit
of the judgment referred to above, to the applicant herein, in case he is similarly situate, within two months from today. The applicant shall produce a
certified copy of this order as well as copy of the judgment referred to above before the respondents/competent authority within a week.â€
Mr. Vikrant Thakur, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the matter as to from which date an incumbent engaged on daily wage basis
is entitled for conferment of work charge status as far as respondentÂBoard is concerned, is pending adjudication before the Hon’ble Supreme
Court. He further submits that even otherwise, the case of the petitioner is not akin to that of Gian Singh’s case, reference of which has been
given by the learned Tribunal in the order passed by by it, contempt of which is alleged by way of this petition.
Be that as it may, in my considered view, it will be appropriate to dispose of this contempt petition, but with a direction to the respondentÂBoard to
pass a speaking order in terms of the directions passed by the learned Tribunal in OA No. 2563 of 2017, decided on 28.07.2017 after hearing the
petitioner. Ordered accordingly. Needful be done by the competent authority within a period of four weeks. It goes without saying that in case the
petitioner is still aggrieved by the order to be passed by the competent authority, then he shall be at liberty to agitate the same by way of appropriate
proceedings in the appropriate Court. Petition stands disposed of in above terms. Notices stand discharged.
