High CourtsDivision Bench(1897) 11 MAD CK 0005

Fischer vs Twigg and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 29 November 1897 · Citation: (1898) ILR (Mad) 367

HON’BLE JUDGES
Subramania Ayyar, J · Shephard, J

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 158 words
1.

It must be assumed that the school buildings are buildings exclusively used for charitable purposes. That being so, the buildings are exempted

from the operation of the notification that may be made u/s 63 of the Act. A tax upon such buildings and other similar buildings mentioned in the

exception is not one which can be in legal existence, and therefore it cannot be said that the tax was collected under the Act. The case is thus

distinguishable from the case relied upon by the petitioner''s vakil--Municipal Council, Nellore v. Rangayya ILR 19 Mad. 10 . We prefer to base

our judgment on the grounds that an imposition, which is expressly prohibited by the Act, cannot be deemed to be made under the provisions of

the hot, rather than on the ground that the case is one in which the party aggrieved is protected by the proviso to Section 262.

2.

We dismiss the petition with costs.