High CourtsDivision Bench

F.P. Nalladaroo and Co. vs Hari Kissen Rathi and Another

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 24 July 1918 · Citation: 48 Ind. Cas. 961

HON’BLE JUDGES
Panton, J · Newbould, J
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 155 words
1.

Our attention has been drawn to a decision of the Allahabad Court in the case of Lalta Prasad v. Ram Karan 32 Ind. Cas. 419 : 30 M.L.J. 323 : 20 C.W.N. 329 : 3 L.W. 210 : 19 M.L.T. 176 : (1916) 1 M.W.N. 150 : 14 A.L.J. 217 : 23 C.L.J. 348 : 18 Bom. L.R. 387 : 9 Bur. L.T. 1 : 43 C. 523 : 8 L.B.R. 536 (P.C.) and also to the decision of the Judicial Committee in the case of Debi Bakhsh Singh v. Hahib Shah (1893) A.C. 170 : 62 L.J.P. 68 : 1 R. 336 : 68 L.T. 546 : 41 W.R. 600 and, on a consideration of these rulings, we are of opinion that the order of the District Judge is not without jurisdiction. We accordingly discharge this Rule with costs, hearing fee two gold mohurs.

2.

Let the record be sent down at once.