AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
28 paragraphs · 262 wordsPetitioner is the Assistant Vicar of a Church and allegedly
the Meghala Convenor of the ''Kerala Madhya Virudha Janakiya
Munnani'' at Rajakkad. According to the petitioner, an outlet of
the Kerala State Beverages Corporation was functioning at
Vyapara Bhavan Building, Ward No.7 of Vellathuval Panchayat.
However, the said building is situated on the side of State
Highway No.59. Consequent to the judgment of the apex
court in '' State of Tamil Nadu and others v. K. Balu and
another '' [2017 (1) KHC 26 (SC)], the said outlet was shifted
to Mangappara, which is more than 10 k.m. away from the
then existing shop.
However, now the Beverages Corporation is taking
steps to start a shop in the building of the Vyapara Bhavan.
Thereupon, petitioner has submitted Ext.P3 dated 07.10.2017
before the 2nd respondent, which is pending consideration.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned
Government Pleader and the learned Standing Counsel for the
3rd respondent Beverages Corporation. Perused the documents
on record and the pleadings put forth by the petitioner.
Since Ext.P3 application is pending consideration
before a statutory authority, I think it is only appropriate that
a direction is issued to attain finality to the same. Therefore,
there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider
Ext.P3 in accordance with law, and attain finality to the same,
after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, at
the earliest and at any rate, within a month from the date of
receipt of a copy of the judgment.
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
