High CourtsSingle Bench

Furkan And Another vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 16 January 2024 · Citation: (2024) 01 UK CK 0187

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Kumar Verma, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 483(1) · Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Section 3(5), 303(2), 317(2)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 83 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 292 words

Alok Kumar Verma, J

1.

The present Application under Section 483(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed for regular bail in connection with the

Case Crime No. 705 of 2024, registered at Kotwali Gangnahar, District Haridwar.

2.

The applicants- Furkan and Sufiyan are in judicial custody for the offence under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,

2023.

3.

As per the First Information Report, on 18.11.2024, the informant’s sister was going in a three wheeler. Someone stole gold and silver jewellery

from her bag. The First Information Report was lodged on 10.12.2024. During the course of investigation, the said jewellery were recovered from the

possession of the applicants on 13.12.2024.

4.

Heard Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for applicants and Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned Brief Holder for the respondent.

5.

Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate, has contended that the applicants are innocent persons. They have been falsely implicated in the present matter.

Nothing was recovered from their possession. Applicants are not previous convicts, and, they are permanent residents of District Haridwar, therefore,

there is no likelihood of their absconding.

6.

Mr. Akshay Latwal, lea ned Brief Holder, has opposed the bail application or ally.

7.

Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any

opinion as to the merit of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicants deserve bail at this stage.

8.

The Bail Application is allowed.

9.

Let the applicants, namely, Furkan and Sufiyan, be released on bail on their executing personal bonds and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in

the like amount, by each one of them, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.