AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
18 paragraphs · 292 wordsAlok Kumar Verma, J
The present Application under Section 483(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed for regular bail in connection with the
Case Crime No. 705 of 2024, registered at Kotwali Gangnahar, District Haridwar.
The applicants- Furkan and Sufiyan are in judicial custody for the offence under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,
2023.
As per the First Information Report, on 18.11.2024, the informant’s sister was going in a three wheeler. Someone stole gold and silver jewellery
from her bag. The First Information Report was lodged on 10.12.2024. During the course of investigation, the said jewellery were recovered from the
possession of the applicants on 13.12.2024.
Heard Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for applicants and Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned Brief Holder for the respondent.
Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate, has contended that the applicants are innocent persons. They have been falsely implicated in the present matter.
Nothing was recovered from their possession. Applicants are not previous convicts, and, they are permanent residents of District Haridwar, therefore,
there is no likelihood of their absconding.
Mr. Akshay Latwal, lea ned Brief Holder, has opposed the bail application or ally.
Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any
opinion as to the merit of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicants deserve bail at this stage.
The Bail Application is allowed.
Let the applicants, namely, Furkan and Sufiyan, be released on bail on their executing personal bonds and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in
the like amount, by each one of them, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
