High CourtsSingle Bench

Future Generali India Insurance Co Ltd vs Suman Goswami & Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 10 November 2017 · Citation: (2017) 11 DEL CK 0547

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.K.Gauba, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
MAC. Appeal No. 235 Of 2012, 163 Of 2013

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 236 words

S.No.,Heads,Compensation

1.,Loss of dependency,"Rs. 13,50,000/-

2.,Funeral charges,"Rs. 10,000/-

3.,Loss of estate,"Rs. 10,000/-

4.,Loss of consortium,"Rs. 10,000/-

5.,Loss of company of deceased,"Rs. 50,000/-

6.,Loss of love and affection,"Rs. 1,00,000/-

,Total,"Rs. 15,30,000/-

accepted as the third party interest cannot be defeated. Since the interests of the insurer are duly protected, it should not grudge the statutory",,

responsibility placed at its door.,,

15.

By order dated 05.03.2012 in MAC Appeal No. 235/2012, the insurance company had been directed to deposit 80% of the awarded amount with",,

the Registrar General. By subsequent order dated 27.05.2013, 50% of the amount thus deposited was permitted to be released to the claimants. In",,

terms of further directions by order dated 01.09.2014, another sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- was released to the first claimant.",,

16.

The registry shall now calculate the amount payable to the claimants under the modified award and release the balance from the remainder,",,

refunding the excess, if any, to the insurer. Conversely, if there is any deficiency in the payment, the insurer will be liable to make the same good by",,

requisite deposit with the tribunal within thirty days to be made available to be released to the claimants.,,

17.

The insurer may exercise its recovery rights by taking out appropriate proceedings before the tribunal.,,

18.

Statutory amount made by the insurer shall be refunded up on proof of deposit being shown.,,

19.

The appeals are disposed of in above terms.,,