High CourtsSingle Bench

G. P. Chandrashekar vs Rojamma @ Leelavathi @ Lalitha W/O. G. P. Chandrashekar

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 10 March 2025 · Citation: (2025) 03 KAR CK 0493

HON’BLE JUDGES
Madhusudhan M.N
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Petition No. 103345 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 121 words

Shivashankar Amarannavar, J

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. Memo reads thus:

“Herein the above named petitioner beg to submit as under:-

That in the top noted petition, petitioner has in a case The petitioner has filed the petition for Quash the Interim Maintenance and arrears attachment of property. But the petitioner and respondent both parties Settlement/ Compromise in this dated 16.12.2024. In Cr.Misc.No.36/2020 and Crl.Misc.No.140/2021 all are cases closed the Principal Judge Family Court Ballari. the petitioner intents to withdraw the petition. Hence the top noted petition may kindly be disposed of as withdrawn, to meet ends of justice.”

2.

In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.