AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
16 paragraphs · 274 wordsBiswanath Rath, J
This matter is taken up through video conferencing.
Heard Mr. Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
During course of hearing, Mr. Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that Original Application involving similar issues
remains subject matter in Division Bench vide W.P.(C).No.33083 of 2020 and W.P.(C).No.13475 of 2021. Both the writ petitions against the
impugned order of the Tribunal have been disposed of with positive observations also covering the case of petitioner herein. There is no dispute at the
Bar that direction therein can also be extended to the petitioner for the similar nature of dispute involved herein.
It is in this view of the matter, this Court disposes of the contempt petition with an observation that the benefit involving the Tribunal direction
involved herein vis-Ã -vis the subsequent development through disposal of W.P.(C).No.33083 of 2020 and W.P.(C).No.13475 of 2021 also be
extended to the petitioner involved herein by working out the entire exercise within a period of six weeks from the date of communication of a copy of
this order by the petitioner. Report compliance be filed before the Registry of this Court within a week thereafter.
This CONTC stands disposed of with the observation made hereinabove.
As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order
available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide
Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No. 4798 dated 15th April, 2021.
………………………
