High CourtsSingle Bench

Gagandeep vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 27 January 2021 · Citation: (2021) 01 P&H CK 0431

HON’BLE JUDGES
Avneesh Jhingan, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Narcotic Drugs And Psychotroic Substantes Act, 1985 — Section 22
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 3055 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 306 words

Avneesh Jhingan, J

The matter is taken up for hearing through video conference due to COVID-19 situation.

This is a petition for regular bail in case arising from FIR No. 56, dated 31st May, 2020, under Section 22 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic

Substances Act, 1985 registered at Police Station Kot Ise Khan.

On the basis of a secret information on 31st May, 2020 car bearing registration No. PB-04-AA-7094 was checked. Including driver there were three

occupants of the car and one of them was petitioner. 650 tablets of Tramadol were recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. There

were recovery made from the conscious possession of other co-accused also.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and is not involved in any other case. He further submits that

challan was presented but charges have not been framed yet.

Learned State counsel opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there were three accused and 650 tablets of Tramadol were recovered from the

petitioner; 700 tablets were recovered from Jeet Singh and 300 tablets were recovered from Money. The contention is that the total recovery is much

more.

Considering the facts; that recovery from the conscious possession of the petitioner is marginally higher than the commercial; challan has been

presented; conclusion of trial will take time; investigation is complete and no recovery is to be made; there is no other case of NDPS is pending

against the petitioner, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail subject to his furnishing surety/bail bonds to the

satisfaction of learned trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

However, it is clarified that anything stated hereinabove shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and is only for the purpose

of deciding the bail application.