High CourtsDivision Bench(2022) 05 BOM CK 0038

Gajanan Eknath Kharabe vs Principal Secretary And Others

Bombay High Court · Decided on 5 May 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sunil B. Shukre, J · M.S. Jawal Kar, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 3457 Of 2021

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 179 words

Sunil B. Shukre, J

1.

Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2.

Mrs. Kirti Satpute, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that facts of this Petition are identical to the facts of Writ Petition No.5864 of 2019 and therefore, this Petition be allowed on similar lines as Writ Petition No.5864 of 2019, which was decided on 2nd March, 2022.

3.

Ms. H.N. Jaipurkar, learned A.G.P. appears for Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 5 does not dispute the aforestated position.

4.

The Writ Petition is, therefore, allowed in terms of prayer clause (i). We direct the Zilla Parishad, Wardha to take all necessary steps for granting notional annual increment to the Petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of the judgment.

The Petitioner would be entitled to receive all consequential benefits accordingly.

Rule is made absolute in the above terms. No costs.

Authenticated copy of the judgment be furnished to all parties.

Parties shall act upon the authenticated copy of the judgment.