AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
32 paragraphs · 606 wordsRajendra Kumar Srivastava, J
This is first bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
The applicant is in custody since 24.06.2021, in connection with Crime No.40/2021, registered at Police Station-Atraila, District Rewa (MP).
As per prosecution story, on 8.3.2021, accused/applicant and other co-accused were assembled along with other co-accused for the purpose of
making preparation for committing dacoity. At that time, Police officials reached on the spot. The applicant/accused and other co-accused were
caught red-handed by the Police.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant/accused has been falsely implicated in this case. The applicant/accused is not previously
convicted. He is in custody since 24.06.2021. Charge sheet has been filed. It is the time of Covid-19 pandemic, due to which, conclusion of trial will
take time. There is is no probability to repeat the said offence. The applicant is the only bread earner of his family and if he is kept in custody for an
unlimited period, then future of his family will be spoiled. There is no possibility of his absconding or tampering with the prosecution evidence. He
further submits that no weapon is seized from the possession of present applicant/accused, applicant/accused was not present at the time of incident.
Co-accused has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 07.06.2021 in M.Cr.C. No. 16962/2021. Applicant is ready to furnish bail as
per the order, abiding with all conditions imposed by the Court. On these grounds, learned counsel for the applicant prays for grant of bail to the
applicant.
Per-contra, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent-State opposes the bail application.
After hearing arguments of the parties and the fact that the applicant/accused is not previously convicted, so there is no probability to repeat the
offence, no weapon has been seized from the possession of applicant, the applicant is in jail since 24.06.2020, charge sheet has been filed, conclusion
of trial will take time, the applicant is only bread earner of his family, there is no probability of his absconding or tampering with the prosecution
evidence, co-accused has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 07.06.2021 in M.Cr.C. No. 16962/2021, it would not be appropriate
to keep the accused/applicant in jail during whole trial, therefore without commenting on merits of the case, application of the applicant under Section
439 of the Cr.P.C. seems to be acceptable. Consequently, it is hereby allowed.
It is directed that applicant-Gajananad Tiwari be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand) with
one surety of the same amount to the satisfaction of the JMFC concerned or trial Court for his appearance before the trial Court on the dates given by
the concerned Court. It is directed that the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C. In view of the outbreak of
'Corona Virus disease (COVID-19)' the applicant shall also comply the rules and norms of social distancing.
Further, in view of the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in suo moto W.P.No.1/2020, it would be appropriate to issue the following direction
to the jail authority :-
The Jail Authority shall ensure the medical examination of the applicant by the jail doctor before his release.
2 . The applicant shall not be released if he is suffering from 'Corona Virus disease'. For this purpose appropriate tests will be carried out.
If it is found that the applicant is suffering from 'Corona Virus disease', necessary steps will be taken by the concerned authority by placing him in
appropriate quarantine facility.
Certified copy as per rules.
