High CourtsDivision Bench

Gajendra Singh Salal vs State Of Uttarakhand & Another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 6 December 2022 · Citation: (2022) 12 UK CK 0032

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vipin Sanghi, CJ · Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (S/B) No. 668 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 140 words

Vipin Sanghi, CJ

1) Issue notice.

Notice is accepted on behalf of the respondents by the learned counsels.

2) The limited grievance of the petitioner is with regard to non-release of the petitioner’s retiral dues which are claimed to be as follows:-

A.

Arrears of 7th Pay Commission

Rs.1,52,619/- (approx) (sanctioned but not paid)

B.

Dearness Allowance

Rs.1,00,701/- (approx) (sanctioned but not paid)

Total Amount

Rs.2,53,320/- (approx)

3) Mr. Bhupendra Singh Bisht, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 states that due to paucity of fund, the respondent has not been able to make payment to him. That cannot be cited as a reason to deny the retired employee his dues.

4) We, therefore, dispose of the present petition with direction to the respondent to release the Dearness

Allowances within five months, and arrears of 7th pay Commission within six months.