Supreme CourtFull Bench

Gajra Bevel Gears vs Collector of Customs

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 2 December 1999 · Citation: (2000) 68 ECC 39 : (2000) 115 ELT 612 : (2000) 10 SCC 215

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. P. Bharucha, J · R. C. Lahoti, J · N. Santosh Hedge, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 9150 Of 1995
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 196 words
1.

We have heard learned Counsel for the appellant and we do not find any reason to interfere. Learned Counsel for the appellant relied upon the judgment of a learned single judge of the High Court at Calcutta in Debabrata Ghosh v. Assistant Collector of Customs . That was a case in which the auction price of a car bought in England was not accepted but the valuation was made by ascertaining the price of the car when new and then allowing depreciation. The learned judge found this impermissible on the facts of that case, as we would have done, because the price of a second-hand car such as that involved in that case could easily have been ascertained by reference to popular magazines and publications relating to cars in England. There are no popular publications that would indicate the prices of machines. Therefore, ascertaining the value of the second-hand machine imported by the appellants, when new, based on the certificate produced by the appellant itself, and scaling down that price by giving depreciation does not appear to be an arbitrary method of ascertaining its value.

2.

The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.