High CourtsSingle Bench

Galib vs State of Uttaranchal

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 4 April 2002 · Citation: (2002) 1 UC 577

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.C.Verma, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 147, 148, 304
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Misc 2nd Bail Application No. 191 of 2001

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 135 words

R. C. Verma, J.—Heard Learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Govt. Advocate.

2.

This is second bail application of appl::ant. The applicant has been assigned a role of attacking on the deceased by Tabal''. From the post mortem report, it is revealed that there is no injury. Only abraded contusions have been found. A blunt object can cause injury of abraded contusion. A sharp edged weapon cannot cause it. Therefore, the applicant is entitled for bail.

3.

Let the applicant Galeb S/o. Mansab be released on bail in case crime No. 214 of 2001, under Sections 147, 148, 304 of the I.P.C, R S. Gangneher Roorkee, District Haridwar, on his furnishing a personal bond with adequate sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee, District Haridwar.