High CourtsSingle Bench

Gama and Ali Jan vs State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 25 May 2011 · Citation: (2011) 05 UK CK 0163

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prafulla C. Pant, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 — Section 39, 44, 51, 52, 9
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 242 of 2011

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 212 words

Prafulla C. Pant, J.—Heard.

2.

Applicants Gama and Ali Jan, who are in jail in connection with Forest Crime No. 4/Mandal/2010-11, relating to offences punishable u/s 9, 39, 44, 51, 52 of Wildlife Protection Act, Police Station Forest Department Mandal Range, Ramnagar, District Nainital, have sought their release on bail.

3.

The Applicants are in jail for last more than three months. Ivory piece is said to have been found from the possession of the Applicant No. 1 Gama a KHADKA (an instrument for poaching) is said to have been found from the possession of Applicant No. 2 Ali Jan.

4.

Learned Counsel for the Applicants submitted that there is no criminal history of the Applicants. It is further pointed out that there is no public witness of the alleged recovery.

5.

In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion as to final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the Applicants deserve bail.

6.

The bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the Applicants Gama and Ali Jan be released on bail on executing personal bond by each one of them and furnishing two sureties by each one of them, each of like amount, to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Ramnagar. (Urgency Application No. 2014/2011 stands disposed of).