High CourtsSingle Bench

Ganga Devi vs State Of Haryana And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 30 January 2020 · Citation: (2020) 01 P&H CK 0224

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay Kumar, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 30278 Of 2018 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 397 words

Sanjay Kumar, J

The petitioner is the Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat of Village Surtia, Block Baragudha, District Sira, State of Haryana. She was suspended from office, vide order dated 5.12.2017 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Sirsa, the second respondent. The same was confirmed in appeal, vide order dated 16.11.2018 (Annexure P-2) passed by the Principal Secretary to Government of Haryana, Development and Panchayats Department. Assailing the said orders, the petitioner filed the present writ petition.

By order dated 5.12.2018 passed in this writ petition, the operation and effect of the impugned orders dated 5.12.2017 and 16.11.2018, Annexures P-1 and P-2 respectively, were stayed.

The complainant, at whose behest action was initiated against the petitioner, got impleaded as respondent No. 3 in the writ petition.

Though the authorities filed their written statement on the merits of the case, it is an admitted fact that the regular inquiry initiated against the petitioner is yet to be concluded by the Sub Divisional Officer (Civil), Kalanwali.

Be it noted that the appellate order dated 16.11.2018 specifically required that the regular inquiry initiated against the petitioner should be completed within a period of one month so that a final decision could be taken in accordance with law. However, despite the aforestated order which was passed as long back as in November, 2018, no effective steps seem to have been taken to conclude the inquiry so that final orders can be passed in the matter. Needless to state, it is not open to a subordinate authority to be totally unmindful and uncaring of a temporal mandate fixed by a superior authority for completing an exercise.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of directing respondent No. 2 to ensure that the regular inquiry initiated against the petitioner is concluded expeditiously and in any event, not later than one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. A final decision shall be taken thereupon within two weeks of the date of receipt of the inquiry report. As the petitioner had the benefit of interim protection, by virtue of the order passed in the writ petition, the same shall continue to operate till the conclusion of the exercise, as stated supra. Original documents filed in this writ petition, if any, shall be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner under acknowledgement and upon filing of photocopies thereof.