CourtKutchehry.com
High CourtsDivision Bench

Gareeb Ram vs Himachal Road Transport And Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 24 September 2021 · Citation: (2021) 09 SHI CK 0073

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravi Malimath, J · Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No.5900 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 170 words

Ravi Malimath, J

1.

Notice. Mr. Ajay K. Chauhan, learned Standing Counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents.

2.

The parties are ad idem that the issue in question is no longer res integra in view of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP No.3050/2014, titled Nek Ram Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 17.7.2014 (Annexure P-2).

3.

Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed off on the basis of the ratio laid down in the aforesaid judgment.

4.

Consequently, the respondents are directed to pay all retiral benefits to the petitioner within a period of six months from today. However, it is made clear that in case the retiral benefits are not paid to the petitioner within the aforesaid time, then in addition to the due statutory benefits, the petitioner shall also be paid interest at the rate of 9% per annum beyond the period of six months till the date of payment.

5.

Pending miscellaneous application is also disposed off.