High CourtsSingle Bench

Gaurav Sharma vs State Of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 26 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 P&H CK 0331

HON’BLE JUDGES
Hari Pal Verma, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 302
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. Of 25586 Of 2020 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

43 paragraphs · 822 words

Hari Pal Verma, J

The matter has been taken up for hearing through video conferencing due to outbreak of COVID-19.

CRM-641-2021:

The application is allowed, as prayed. Statements of PW-2 to PW-4 are taken on record as Annexures P-9 to P-11 respectively.

CRM-1084-2021:

The application is allowed, as prayed. Statement of PW-1 is taken on record as Annexure P-12.

CRIMINAL MISC. NO.M-25586 OF 2020:

Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR

No.568 dated 22.11.2018 under Sections 302, 34 IPC registered at Police Station Baldev Nagar, District Ambala.

As per the FIR, on 20.11.2018 at about 9-00 P.M. Balbir Singh (deceased) had a fight with the petitioner-Gaurav and co-accused Devender Singh. As

a result thereof, he suffered some injuries on his left eye and head On the next day, the matter was compromised between the parties. However, on

21.11.2018 at about 08:00 PM, Gaurav, the present petitioner and Devender Singh, co-accused, called the deceased and they again gave beatings to

him after consuming liquor. On the next morning, the condition of Balbir Singh started deteriorating and accordingly, he was shifted to hospital, where

he died, on account of head injuries. The Board of Doctors opined that the cause of death of the deceased was head injuries and their complications.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner is in custody since 06.06.2019. There is already a compromise between the parties.

At the most, the injury attributed to the petitioner is swelling over the left eye with blackish discoloration and PW-1 Dr. Mala Chandra, Medical

Officer, General Hospital, Ambala City, in her statement stated that during post-mortem, following injuries were found as per the PMR Ex.PW-1/A

and its computer generated copy Ex.PW1/B:-

“1. Left back eye (upper and lower eyelid) amild left eye conjuctival congestion present.

2.

Bilateral parietal region swelling present on dissection. Meninges are intact, blood vessels engorged more on left side than right side.â€​

He further submits that the injury attributed to the petitioner is injury No.1. The complainant- Kulwant Kaur, who is none else but the mother of the

deceased, has been examined in the case and she has not supported the case of the prosecution and rather, she has been declared hostile and similarly

father and uncle of the deceased have also been examined and they have also not supported the case of the prosecution. Interestingly, there is an

allegation in the FIR that on 21.11.2018 at about 08:00 PM, after drinking alcohol, the accused-petitioner and co-accused-Devender Singh after giving

beatings to the deceased, dropped him at his house and thereafter, the deceased slept. But in the next morning, the deceased became sick, for which

he was taken to General Hospital, Ambala City. The injury attributed to the petitioner is on the left eye with kara, whereas kick blows were given by

co-accused Devender Singh. He further submits that apart from the fact that the matter was compromised on 21.04.2020 and the PWs, who have

been examined in the case, have not supported the case of prosecution and thus there are very bleak chances of his conviction and therefore,

considering the long custody of the petitioner, he deserves to be admitted on bail.

Learned State counsel does not dispute the custody of the petitioner and submits that there are allegations that the petitioner along with co-accused

has given injuries to the deceased, which led to his death. The other co-accused Devender Singh has not been arrested and has been declared

proclaimed offender. Therefore, the petitioner does not deserve to be admitted on bail.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties.

The present case was registered on the statement of none else but the mother of the deceased namely Kulwant Kaur. In the FIR, there is a specific

recital that the petitioner has inflicted injury on the person of deceased Balbir Singh on his left eye with Kara , whereas kick blows were attributed to

co-accused-Devender Singh. The witnesses namely i.e. PW-2 Kulwant Kaur, PW-3 Karnail Singh and PW-4 Swaran Singh have been examined in

the case. They are none else than the mother, father and uncle of the deceased respectively. They have not supported the case of the prosecution and

rather, resiled from their previous statements. In this manner, the prosecution is yet to be establish their own case beyond all probabilities.

Be that as it may, without observing anything on the merits of the case, but considering long custody of the petitioner and the fact that PW-2 Kulwant

Kaur, PW-3 Karnail Singh and PW-4 Swaran Singh have not supported the case of the prosecution, this Court deems it appropriate to admit the

petitioner on regular bail.

Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is admitted on regular bail, subject to furnishing of his bail bonds/surety bonds to the

satisfaction of trial Court.