High CourtsSingle Bench

Gavari Devi And Others vs Sardar Khan And Others

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 11 March 2024 · Citation: (2024) 03 RAJ CK 0033

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rekha Borana, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1066 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 188 words

Rekha Borana, J

1.

Lawyers are abstaining from work.

2.

None has appeared for the appellants.

3.

On 26.07.2023, none appeared on behalf of the appellants and the following order was passed by the Court:

“As per the office report, notices have been filed only in one set despite the order dated 15.05.2023 to file the same in two sets.

A week’s time is granted to file one extra set of notices. On the same being filed, let it be given ‘dasti’ to learned counsel for the appellant to be sent through registered post.

If the notices are not filed within the stipulated period, the appeal be listed for dismissal before the Court.”

4.

Subsequent to that, the matter was listed on 07.11.2023 and on that date also, time was granted and the matter was directed to be listed on 11.03.2024.

5.

As per the office report, complete PF & notices have not been filed till date.

6.

In view of the same, the present appeal is dismissed in non-compliance.

7.

Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and all pending application, if any, stand disposed of.