High CourtsSingle Bench

Geeta vs State of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 22 January 2015 · Citation: (2015) 01 PAT CK 0009

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9889 of 2013

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 377 words

Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.—The Court is not willing to relegate the petitioner back to the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Sheikhpura at this stage because it will be an unnecessary exercise.

2.

The present writ application has been filed by the petitioner because she has not been paid remuneration from the date of her joining on the post of Panchayat teacher, which is 4-1-2011. The petitioner is not the only sufferer,, other persons, who came to appointed by the Panchayat in the same transaction whose names figured in Annexure-5 of the writ application, moved the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Sheikhpura, with identical grievance of non-payment of remuneration after their appointment and joining.

3.

A copy of the order passed by the District Appellate Tribunal in the case of other Panchayat teachers, which is dated 29-12-2014, has been tendered to this Court. The Court has gone through the said order, which is a very detailed and well-considered order. The Tribunal has also gone into the aspect of the validity of the appointment and the reason for non-payment of remuneration as well. The finding of the Tribunal is that there was some delay in communication of the appointment of these persons by the Block Education Officer, Sheikhpura which has created problem in relation to appointment. No finding has emerged that there was anything amiss with regard to such selection and appointment. The Tribunal has also taken note of various communication made by the Director, Primary Education and other authorities clarifying that stoppage of payment cannot be done on the ground of delayed communication. A copy of the order passed by the Tribunal is placed on record of the present writ application for any future reference.

4.

If this be so, and the petitioner having been appointed in the same transaction as Sri Chandra Kishore Tuddu, Sri Sanjay Ram, Smt. Surgyani Kumari etc., the writ application of the petitioner is allowed.

5.

The respondent-authorities including the Block Education Officer, Sheikhpura and Panchayat Secretary of the Gram Panchayat concerned are directed to ensure that the petitioner is paid her rightful claim not only with regard to the current employment but even the arrears within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order.