High CourtsDivision Bench

Geeta Devi vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 10 June 2026 · Citation: (2026) 06 UK CK 0539

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Gupta, CJ · Subhash Upadhyay, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/B) No. 483 Of 2026
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 224 words

Manoj Kumar Gupta, CJ

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The present writ petition has been filed praying for the following relief:

"i) Issue a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 19.02.2025 (Annexure No.5, Page No.35-39), impugned order dated 25.06.2025 (Annexure No.7, Page No.42-44) and Impugned order dated 09.02.2026, (Annexure No.10, Page No.47-50) passed by State Tax Officer Almora, Sector-1, Haldwani Uttarakhand.

ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to forthwith revive the GST registration No.05BNDPD8576R1ZB of the petitioner."

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would apply for revocation of the order cancelling the GST registration and the same may be directed to be considered.

4.

Ms. Puja Banga, learned counsel for the revenue has no objection to the same.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner also states that the petitioner would challenge the order dated 19.02.2025 and the order passed on his rectification application by filing appeal.

6.

In view of the same, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to apply for revocation of the order cancelling GST registration and to avail the remedy of appeal against the order passed under Section 73 of the Act and on the rectification application.

7.

Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.