High CourtsFull Bench

Ghasiram vs Mussammat Nuraj Begam

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 17 August 1875 · Citation: (1875) ILR (All) 31

HON’BLE JUDGES
Turner, O.C.J. · Spankie, J · Pearson, J · Oldfield, J
RESULT
Dismissed
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 363 words
1.

It has been argued, it is doubtful from the language of the honourable the Chief Justice, whether, u/s 353 *, Civil Procedure Code, he intended to frame and remit issues for trial, or u/s 355 � merely to direct the Court below to take further evidence. We think it unnecessary to determine this point, because we are of opinion that in either view this appeal cannot be entertained.

2.

There has been no judgment in the sense in which we construe that term in Clause 10 of the Letters Patent. There must be such a judgment on the part of all the learned and honourable Judges who may constitute a Bench as disposes of the suit on appeal before it. The learned Chief Justice has as yet recorded no such judgment, and to enable the Bench to do so, he has considered it necessary to obtain further materials.

3.

Under the circumstances, we reject the appeal, and as the respondents have appeared, with costs.

When the evidence is *[Section 353:-When the evidence upon the record of the Lower sufficient, the Appellate Court is sufficient to enable the Appellate Court to pronounce a Court must determine the satisfactory judgment, the Appellate Court shall finally determine case though the Lower the case, notwithstanding that the judgment of the Lower Court Court has decided on other has proceeded wholly upon some other ground.] grounds. �[Section 355:--It shall not be competent to the parties in an appeal to produce additional evidence in the Appellate Court, whether of exhibits or witnesses; When the Appellate Court but if it appears that the Lower Court refused to admit competent may call for fresh evidence, evidence, or if the Appellate Court require any exhibits to be produced or witnesses examined to enable it to pronounce a satisfactory judgment, or for any other substantial cause, the Appellate Court may allow additional exhibits to be received and any necessary witnesses to be examined, whether such witnesses shall have been previously examined in the Court below or not provided that, whenever additional evidence is admitted by an Appellate Court, the reasons for the admission shall be recorded on the proceedings of such Court.]