AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
29 paragraphs · 638 wordsM.R.Anitha, J
Petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No. 662/2021 of Kalloorkkad Police Station.
It is alleged that on 16.07.2021 at about 10.30 a.m, the petitioner/accused trespassed into the residential house of the defacto complainant at
Kalloorkkad and robbed gold ornaments worth Rs.3,50,000/- after assaulting and intimidating the defacto complainant and his wife. During that course,
he alleged to have slashed at the hand of wife of defacto complainant with a knife and Mobile Phone worth Rs.15,000/- and cash of Rs.1800/- were
also robbed. It is further alleged that he gagged her and forcibly pushed her down, when she resisted rubbed her face on the floor and intimidated to
do away with her and thereby committed the offences punishable under Sections 450, 506(ii), 397, 341, 324 and 461 of IPC.
According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner has been under confinement for more than six months. He is not involved in any
other crime and his wife delivered a child and the baby is two months old. Charge sheet has already been filed and hence continued confinement of
the petitioner is not necessary. Hence he seeks for granting bail to the petitioner.
The learned Public Prosecutor on the other hand filed report of the SHO along with the copy of the FIR and FIS and the wound certificate of the
defacto complainant. It is contended that the defacto complainant and the wife are senior citizens and the release of the petitioner would be a real
threat to their life since their children are at abroad and these old couples are living alone in the house.
This is the second application for bail by the petitioner before this Court. The earlier application filed by the petitioner was dismissed taking into the
serious nature of the offences committed by the petitioner during broad daylight. However, report filed by the investigating officer would not reveal
that the petitioner is involved in any other crime. His wife also said to have delivered a new baby who is two months old. The investigation is also over
and Final Report also has been filed. At the time of considering the earlier application for bail by the petitioner before this Court there was submission
from the Prosecutor that the petitioner was not shown and got identified by the defacto complainant. Now that procedure is also over. So in view of
the period of confinement for more than six months already undergone by him and further that he is not involved in any other crime and also that the
charge sheet has already been filed, I am of the view that bail can be granted to the petitioner/accused on the following stringent conditions:
i) The petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees one lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the
satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction.
ii) The petitioner shall not leave the State of Kerala and shall not enter into the Taluk where the defacto complainant and family resides, until further orders.
iii) Petitioner shall surrender his passport before the trial court within ten days from the date of his release on bail and in case he does not have any passport, he shall
file an affidavit to that effect.
iv) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him
from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
v) The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.
In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the Assistant Sessions Court is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law.
