High CourtsDivision Bench

Gobind Ram Marwary vs Mathoora Sabooya and Others

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 11 January 1878 · Citation: (1878) ILR (Cal) 339

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kennedy, J · Jackson, J
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 154 words

Jackson, J.—The lower Appellate Court dismissed the appeal of the plaintiff, and, it may be said, virtually dismissed his suit, on the ground that notice--that is to say, formal written notice--of dishonour had not been served on the defendants. Now, neither the case which the lower Appellate Court cites, Anunt Ram Agurwala v. Nuthall 21 W.R. 62 nor any other case, has been brought to our notice which decides that in this country either a written formal notice of dishonour is necessary, or that the absence of such a notice would be a sufficient defence unless it is shown that by such absence the defendant has been prejudiced. So far, therefore, the judgment of the lower Appellate Court appears to be erroneous, and must be set aside. [The learned Judge then proceeded to consider the other points in the case, and with reference to them, the case was remanded to the lower Appellate Court.]