High CourtsSingle Bench

Gola vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 21 December 2020 · Citation: (2020) 12 P&H CK 0353

HON’BLE JUDGES
Harnaresh Singh Gill, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438, 438(2) · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 323, 324, 326
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 38718 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 367 words

Harnaresh Singh Gill, J

Case is taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

This is a petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No.84 dated 02.5.2020 registered under Sections 326,

323, 324, 34 IPC at Police Station Ajnala, District Amritsar.

This Court, on 24.11.2020, passed the following order:

“Case is taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

This is a petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 84 dated 02.5.2020 under Sections 326, 323, 324, 34 IPC

registered at Police Station Ajnala, District Amritsar.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is delay of 09 months in lodging the present FIR as the occurrence took place on 28.8.2019

whereas the present FIR has been registered on 02.5.2020.

Notice of motion.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. Sandeep Kumar, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the State. He has pointed out that the petitioner has

inflicted injury on the right side of the head near the ear of the complainant, which was declared grievous in nature but he has not disputed the fact

that there is a delay of 09 months in lodging the present FIR.

Adjourned to 21.12.2020.

Meanwhile, petitioner is directed to join the investigation and if he is sought to be arrested, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the

Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer subject to the conditions as envisaged in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

However, anticipatory bail, granted while exercising the judicial discretion, should not operate as an inroad into the statutory investigational power of

the police.â€​

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the order dated 24.11.2020 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Baljeet Singh, submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is now not required for any

further investigation.

In view of the above, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 24.11.2020 granting interim bail

to the petitioner, is made absolute, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.