AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
21 paragraphs · 441 wordsThe applicant is the 1st accused in Crime No.2509 of 2020 of Karunagappally Police Station, Kollam, for having allegedly committed offences
punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 452, 294(b), 323, 324 and 308 read with Section 149 of the IPC. The prosecution case, in brief, is this:
On 30.08.2020 at about 11.30 PM, the applicant along with the other four persons, formed an unlawful assembly and in the prosecution of the
common object of the said unlawful assembly and having made preparation, they trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant and assaulted
him with dangerous weapons like axe, sword, sticks, etc., and caused injuries on him, which could have proved fatal and thus the applicant attempted
to commit culpable homicide. The reasons for the attack is that the defacto complainant had informed the Excise officials regarding the applicant being
involved in some drug case and in consequence of which even a raid was conducted in his house. But, there was nothing recovered from his house.
Irked by that act of the defacto complainant, the present assault was done by the applicant and the other co-accused. The applicant had approached
this Court for anticipatory bail vide order dated 04.11.2020 in B.A.No.6915 of 2020, the bail application was disposed of with a direction to the
applicant surrender before the investigating Officer within two weeks. He was allegedly arrested on 15.11.2020 and remanded to judicial custody. He
continues to remain in custody. The applicant states that he has no other criminal antecedents. And, therefore, he may be granted bail.
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and the learned Public Prosecutor. The learned Public Prosecutor admits that the applicant
has no other records of criminal antecedents. The recovery is completed and therefore, further incarceration of the applicant may not be necessary.
Under the circumstances, I find that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
In the result, the application is allowed and the applicant is directed to be released on bail on the execution of a bond for Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty
thousand only), with two solvent sureties, each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court and on following further conditions:
(i) He shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called for.
(ii) He shall not intimidate or influence witnesses and tamper with evidence.
(iii) He shall not get involved in similar offences during the currency of the bail period.
In case of breach of any of the bail conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to apply for cancellation of the bail before the jurisdictional court.
The bail application is allowed.
