High CourtsSingle Bench

Gopal vs State of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 31 March 2011 · Citation: (2011) 03 P&H CK 0076

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Singh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 438(2) · Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 120B, 323, 395, 420, 467
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
CRM-M- No. 7016 of 2011 (O and M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 190 words

Alok Singh, J.—This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No. 24 dated 12.1.2011 under Sections 323, 395, 506 of the Indian

Penal Code and Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC (added later on), registered at Police Station Sector 55, Faridabad, District Faridabad.

2.

This Court vide order dated 7.3.2011 has directed to release the Petitioners on bail.

3.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that Petitioner has already been released on bail and the Petitioner has joined the investigation and shall

join the investigation as and when he is asked to do so by the Investigating Officer.

4.

Mr. Gaurav Dhir, DAG, Haryana, on instructions from ASI Prahlad Singh, who is present personally in Court, has stated that Petitioner is co-

operating in the investigation.

5.

Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, petition is allowed. Order dated 7.3.2011 is made absolute, subject to the

conditions mentioned u/s 438(2) Code of Criminal Procedure However, it is clarified that Petitioner shall keep on co-operating in the investigation

and if he fails to do so Investigating Officer shall be at liberty to get the bail cancelled.