High CourtsSingle Bench

Gopi Ram vs State Of Rajasthan And Others

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 5 April 2023 · Citation: (2023) 04 RAJ CK 0012

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dinesh Mehta, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Contempt No. 1758 Of 2018 In Writ Petition No. 6397 Of 2015
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 82 words

Dinesh Mehta, J

1.

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that due compliance of the order, non-compliance whereof has been alleged, has been made.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid fact.

3.

In view of the aforesaid and in view of the unconditional apology tendered by the respondents, this Court is not inclined to continue with the present contempt proceedings.

4.

Notice of contempt is hereby discharged.

5.

The contempt petition stands disposed of for statistical purposes.