AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
1 paragraphs · 45 wordsGarth, C.J.—We are satisfied that the case comes under Article 65, and not under Article 75, and we are ready to hear the appellant on the merits. (The case was then heard, and a decision on the merits given in favour of the plaintiff, respondent).