High CourtsSingle Bench

Govind V Jathar vs Mehak Varandani

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 5 June 2025 · Citation: (2025) 06 KAR CK 0184

HON’BLE JUDGES
H.P. Sandesh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Succession Act, 1925 — Section 232, 232(a), 276 · Rules Governing Probate And Administration Matters, 1964 — Rule 5
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision Petition No. 528 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 120 words

Shivashankar Amarannavar, J

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner files memo.

2.

Memo reads thus;

“In the above matter the trial Court was convicted the petitioner and directed to pay fine of Rupees 1,35,000/- (One Lakh Thirty Five Thousand).

The petitioner has deposited on 2/3/18 for a sum of Rs.13,500/- and on 3/7/2021 for a sum of Rs.1,21,500/-. The petitioner has already paid the total amount of the fine amount of Rupees 1,35,000/-.

Under the circumstances, the petition does not survive. Hence, the petitioner most respectfully prays that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to dismiss the petition as not pressed in the interest of justice.”

3.

In view of the memo, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed as not pressed.