High CourtsSingle Bench

Govind Yadav vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 2 January 2018 · Citation: (2018) 01 CHH CK 0023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 120B, 384, 342, 365, 420 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 7277 Of 2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 420 words

Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant, J

1.

This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has

been arrested in connection with Crime No.129 of 2017, registered at Police Station - Amleshwar, District - Durg, Chhattisgarh for the offence

punishable under Sections 420, 384, 342, 365 and 120B/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is in jail since 20.9.2017 and has been falsely implicated in this case. As alleged in the

FIR against the applicant, the date of incident is 2.12.2015. Thereafter, a written complaint was given to police on 22.12.2015 whereas the FIR has

been registered on 18.5.2017 after a long lapse. On reading of the documents in the charge-sheet, it is clear that no case is made out against the

applicant. The applicant is a local resident of District Durg and he is ready to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed on him. Hence, it is

prayed that the applicant be enlarged on bail.

3.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application. It is submitted that the offence committed is of grievous nature, hence,

the applicant is not entitled for grant of bail.

4.

Heard counsel for both the parties and perused the case diary.

5.

The case against the applicant is that on 2.12.2015 at about 12:00 noon the applicant and others abducted complainant - Bhawani Sahu and forced

him to sign some blank stamp papers by using force and also by threatening to cause death. After completion of investigation, the charge- sheet has

been filed.

6.

Considering the submissions and the contents of the case-diary and the fact that the documents which have been allegedly signed by the

complainant when he was forced to sign have not been seized in the investigation, I am of this view that the applicant is a local resident shall be

available for the trial and no purpose would be served if the applicant is kept in detention for the whole period of trial, this application is allowed.

7.

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is allowed.

8.

It is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the

satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, for his appearance as and when directed.