High CourtsDivision Bench(1923) 02 MAD CK 0012

Govindu Kaviraj Purohito vs Gauranga Saw and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 16 February 1923 · Citation: 75 Ind. Cas. 739

HON’BLE JUDGES
Venkatasubba Row, J · Francis Oldfield, J

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 250 words
1.

These are applications to the Court. to amend the cause title in a second appeal ana to exec se the delay in seeking that relief. It will, of course,

be unnecessary to consider the second application, unless the first succee s. The circumstances in which the amendment is asked for are that the

respondent, whose name is entered in the appeal as presented died before the presentation. We are now asked to substitute for his name those of

the legal representatives. In the objection to this that an appeal cannot be presented against a person who has ceased to exist Order 1, Rule 10 is

relied on, but we do not see our way to apply it here, since it refers to suits instituted in the name of a wrong person, and we do not think that it is

applicable to a case, such as the present. The power conferred by Section 153 is general, but again we do not think we ought to use it, while

another course is open to the petitioner, that course being to file another appeal and to have the delay due to his mistake committed in good faith

excuse.

2.

Taking this view, we must dismiss these applications and also the second appeal on the ground that no such proceeding as an appeal against a

party, who is deceased, is authorised by the Code. There will be no costs in second appeal but the petitioner will pay the respondent''s costs in the

petitions.