High CourtsSingle Bench

Great Electrical Engineering Works vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Mohd. Ashfaq and State of U.P.

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 23 September 2003 · Citation: (2006) 106 FLR 82

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anjani Kumar, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 11669 of 1983
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 339 words

Anjani Kumar, J.—Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The petitioner, aggrieved by an award given by the Labour Court, Meerut in adjudication case No. 100/77 C.A., approached this court by means of this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, The following dispute was referred for adjudication to the Labour Court :

^^D;k lsok;kstdksa }kjk vius deZpkjh Jh eksgEen v"Qkd �vkyk Jh eks- b"Qkd � dks fnukad 4-10-73 ls dk;Z iwjd fd;k tkuk mfpr rFkk vFkok oS/kkfud gS A ;fn ugh rks lEcfU/kr Jfed fdlds }kjk fdl YkkHk@{kfriwfrZ ikus dk vf/kdkjh gS rFkk fdl vU; fooj.k lfgr \\**

3.

The Labour Court has held that because of the referring order dated 17.12.1974, wherein the dispute has been referred to in the name of the Presiding Officer, Shri S.H.J. Naqvi though the dispute has now been transferred to Labour Court, Meerut, he is of the opinion that he, in the circumstances, since the reference is made in the name of the Presiding Officer, he, the successor of the Labour Court and its Presiding Officer has no jurisdiction to decide the same.

4.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that this view of the Labour Court is firstly not; supported by. any law and contrary to law sealed by the Apex Court reported in1982(45) FLR 183 that the Labour Court is under legal obligation to answer the reference whatsoever, whether it is addressed by name of the Presiding Officer, who was, then presiding the Court or is now transferred to successor Labour Court. In view of the aforesaid settled case, this petition deserves to be allowed. The award of the Labour Court deserves to be quashed and is hereby quashed. The matter is remanded back to the; Labour Court for deciding the same in accordance with law. Since the matter is more than 20 years old. Labour Court is directed to decide the same expeditiously, preferably, within a period of six months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order before them.