AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
32 paragraphs · 454 wordsC. Hari Shankar, J
ARB.P. 511/2020, ARB.P. 513/2020 and ARB.P. 540/2020
Mr. Akhil Sibal, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner in these petitions under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,
1996 (hereinafter referred to as “1996 Actâ€), submits that the disputes, in these petitions, pertain to Agreements which are, by and large, similar
and relate to passive infrastructure facilities, availed by the respondent and provided by the petitioner, and the grievance of the petitioner specially
relates to non-payments of certain invoices raised by the petitioner. He points out that though the Agreements, in these four cases are otherwise
identical, the Agreement in Arb. P. 512/2020 provides for resolution of the disputes by the learned Arbitral Tribunal comprising three members,
whereas the clause in the other three petitions does not mandatorily require arbitration by a three-member Arbitral Tribunal. He submits that as the
disputes are identical and the Agreements are also similar, it would be appropriate if all the disputes are referred to a sole arbitrator, of sufficient
standing, to arbitrate thereon.
Mr. Sameer Aggarwal, learned counsel for the respondent-Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL), submits that the BSNL has already nominated
an arbitrator, consequent to the request made by the petitioner on 10th December, 2020. As the appointment has been made after these petitions were
filed, it is clearly not permissible in view of the law laid down in Datar Switchgears Ltd. v. Tata Finance Ltd. (2000) 8 SCC 151 and UOI. v. Bharat
Battery Mfg. Co. (P) Ltd. (2007) 7 SCC 684.
Mr. Aggarwal submits that that, insofar as Arb. P. 512/2020 is concerned, he would have to take instructions on whether the BSNL is agreeable to
arbitration of the disputes relating to this petition by a sole arbitrator.
In view thereof, Arb. P. 511/2020, Arb. P. 513/2020 and Arb. P. 540/2020 are disposed of by appointing Hon’ble Mr Justice Madan B. Lokur
as arbitrator, to arbitrate on the disputes between the parties, as set out in the Arbitration Petitions. The contact details of the learned arbitrator are
provided as under:
A-26, First Floor, Gulmohar Park,
New Delhi-110049.
Phone Nos.: 011-42484424
9868219007
Emai ID: madanlokur.arb@gmail.com
As requested by both sides, the fees of the learned arbitrator would be as per the 4th Schedule to the 1996 Act.
The arbitrator would also furnish the requisite disclosure in terms of Section 12(2) of the 1996 Act within one week of entering on reference
thereof.
Arb. P. 511/2020, Arb. P. 513/2020 and Arb. P. 540/2020 stand disposed of accordingly.
IA 10043/2020 in Arb. P. 540/2020
In view of the order passed in the petition, this application stands disposed of.
Arb. P. 512/2020
Renotify on 12th March, 2021.
