High CourtsSingle Bench

Gtl Infrastructure Limited vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

Delhi High Court · Decided on 3 March 2021 · Citation: (2021) 03 DEL CK 0052

HON’BLE JUDGES
C. Hari Shankar, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 11(6), 12(2)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Arbitration Petition No. 511, 512, 513 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

32 paragraphs · 454 words

C. Hari Shankar, J

ARB.P. 511/2020, ARB.P. 513/2020 and ARB.P. 540/2020

1.

Mr. Akhil Sibal, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner in these petitions under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,

1996 (hereinafter referred to as “1996 Actâ€), submits that the disputes, in these petitions, pertain to Agreements which are, by and large, similar

and relate to passive infrastructure facilities, availed by the respondent and provided by the petitioner, and the grievance of the petitioner specially

relates to non-payments of certain invoices raised by the petitioner. He points out that though the Agreements, in these four cases are otherwise

identical, the Agreement in Arb. P. 512/2020 provides for resolution of the disputes by the learned Arbitral Tribunal comprising three members,

whereas the clause in the other three petitions does not mandatorily require arbitration by a three-member Arbitral Tribunal. He submits that as the

disputes are identical and the Agreements are also similar, it would be appropriate if all the disputes are referred to a sole arbitrator, of sufficient

standing, to arbitrate thereon.

2.

Mr. Sameer Aggarwal, learned counsel for the respondent-Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL), submits that the BSNL has already nominated

an arbitrator, consequent to the request made by the petitioner on 10th December, 2020. As the appointment has been made after these petitions were

filed, it is clearly not permissible in view of the law laid down in Datar Switchgears Ltd. v. Tata Finance Ltd. (2000) 8 SCC 151 and UOI. v. Bharat

Battery Mfg. Co. (P) Ltd. (2007) 7 SCC 684.

3.

Mr. Aggarwal submits that that, insofar as Arb. P. 512/2020 is concerned, he would have to take instructions on whether the BSNL is agreeable to

arbitration of the disputes relating to this petition by a sole arbitrator.

4.

In view thereof, Arb. P. 511/2020, Arb. P. 513/2020 and Arb. P. 540/2020 are disposed of by appointing Hon’ble Mr Justice Madan B. Lokur

as arbitrator, to arbitrate on the disputes between the parties, as set out in the Arbitration Petitions. The contact details of the learned arbitrator are

provided as under:

A-26, First Floor, Gulmohar Park,

New Delhi-110049.

Phone Nos.: 011-42484424

9868219007

Emai ID: madanlokur.arb@gmail.com

5.

As requested by both sides, the fees of the learned arbitrator would be as per the 4th Schedule to the 1996 Act.

6.

The arbitrator would also furnish the requisite disclosure in terms of Section 12(2) of the 1996 Act within one week of entering on reference

thereof.

7.

Arb. P. 511/2020, Arb. P. 513/2020 and Arb. P. 540/2020 stand disposed of accordingly.

IA 10043/2020 in Arb. P. 540/2020

In view of the order passed in the petition, this application stands disposed of.

Arb. P. 512/2020

Renotify on 12th March, 2021.