AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
13 paragraphs · 246 wordsThe present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.274/2011 Registered at Police Station Bayana,
District Bharatpur F.R. No.110/2011 for the offence under Section 420 IPC.
Heard learned counsel for the parties. On consideration of submissions made on behalf of the respective parties and the material made available for
my perusal as well as the evidence collected during investigation, which has been produced before me by way of case diary but without expressing
any final opinion on the merit and de-merit of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused- petitioner.
Consequently, the application for anticipatory bail is allowed.
The SHO/IO/Arresting Authority, Police Station Bayana, District Bharatpur F. R. No. 110/2011 in FIR No.274/2011 is directed that in the event of
arrest of the petitioner-Gulshan Kumar S/o Hetram, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with
two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to his satisfaction on the following conditions:-
(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as
to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and
(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
