High CourtsSingle Bench

Gurdeep Singh @ Deepa - Petitioner @HASH State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 18 October 2016 · Citation: (2016) 4 LawHerald 3395 : (2017) 1 RCRCriminal 135

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jitendra Chauhan, J.
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 439 · Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS) — Section 22
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
CRM-M No. 16012 of 2016 (O&M).
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 250 words

Jitendra Chauhan, J. (Oral)—By filing the present petition, under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner has sought regular bail in FIR No. 267 dated 18.12.2014, registered under Sections 21 & 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short ''NDPS Act''), at Police Station City Moga, District Moga.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Allegedly 105 gm of intoxicant powder was recovered from the petitioner which is marginally higher than the non commercial quantity. The petitioner is behind the bars for 08 months.

3.

On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the bail application and states that the contraband allegedly recovered from the petitioner is of commercial quantity I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

4.

It is debatable whether the quantity is commercial or otherwise. Considering the fact that the challan stands presented; out of total 13 PWs, only 02 PWs have been examined so far, therefore, it can be safely inferred that the trial is not likely to be concluded in the near future, without adverting to the merits of the instant case, this petition is allowed. The petitioner be admitted to bail during the pendency of trial, on his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds, to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

5.

Anything said herein above shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case.