High CourtsSingle Bench

Gurmail Singh vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 11 December 2020 · Citation: (2020) 12 P&H CK 0196

HON’BLE JUDGES
Gurvinder Singh Gill, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Narcotic Drugs And Psychotroic Substantes Act, 1985 — Section 22 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 21957 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 366 words

Gurvinder Singh Gill, J

1.

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking grant of anticipatory bail in respect of a case registered vide FIR No.232 dated 28.06.2020 at

Police Station Sadar Dhuri, District Sangrur, under Section 22 of the NDPS Act, wherein it is alleged that a secret information has been received

against the petitioner that he was indulging in sale of intoxicant tablets and on account of which barricading was laid, but despite the said barricading,

the petitioner is alleged to have escaped while leaving a polythene bag carried by him which led to recovery of 130 intoxicant tablets of Clovidol-100-

SR stated to be containing ‘tramadol’.

2.

At the time of issuance of notice of motion on 07.08.2020, the following order was passed:

“The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner was never arrested at the spot despite the fact that it is the case of prosecution

that there was prior secret information against the petitioner nor any recovery was effected from him and that the petitioner has been falsely

implicated in the present case. Notice of motion for 11.12.2020.

Meanwhile, in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on interim bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction

of Arresting/Investigating Officer. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and cooperate with the

Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.â€​

3.

The learned State counsel upon instructions from ASI Gurlabh Singh has informed that pursuant to interim directions, the petitioner has since joined

investigation and is not required for any custodial interrogation.

4.

Having regard to the fact that the petitioner was never apprehended at the spot and is stated to have joined investigation and is not even a previous

convict, the petition is accepted and the interim directions issued by this Court vide order dated 07.08.2020 are hereby made absolute subject to the

condition that the petitioner shall join investigation as and when called upon to do so and cooperate with the Investigating Officer and shall also abide

by the conditions as provided under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.