High CourtsSingle Bench

Gurmail Singh @ Geja vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 29 October 2018 · Citation: (2018) 10 P&H CK 0201

HON’BLE JUDGES
Surinder Gupta, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439, 437(2) · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 302
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous (M) No.7343 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 339 words

The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.307 dated

21.12.2015 registered for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code (for short, “IPCâ€) at Police Station

Tanda, District Hoshiarpur.

Heard.

As per case of prosecution, son of complainant, namely, Manga, aged about 22 years was left at the house of complainant at about 11.30 p.m. by

petitioner and his co-accused, Des Raj @ Desu. He was unconscious at that time. Complainant was apprised that petitioner and his co-accused, Des

Raj @ Desu, had taken away Manga at about 11.00 p.m. in their trolley and given him beatings. Des Raj @ Desu also gave slaps to Manga, when

they left him at the house of complainant.

Learned State counsel submits that as per medical report, the deceased had either consumed or was made to consume aluminum phosphate.

Complainant, his wife and Bhagwan Singh have appeared before the trial Court but they have not supported the case of prosecution. The petitioner

was arrested in this case on 26.07.2017.

Keeping in view submission of learned State counsel and statements of material witnesses recorded so far and that conclusion of trial will take

considerably long time, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner-Gurmail Singh @ Geja is ordered to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond

and surety bond to the satisfaction of concerned trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, subject to following terms:-

(a) The petitioner shall comply with the conditions mentioned in Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

(b) In the event of his absence on any date of hearing, the benefit of bail allowed to the petitioner shall stand withdrawn. The trial Court shall be

competent to cancel his bail bond and surety bond and proceed to procure his presence in accordance with law. In that eventuality the petitioner shall

have to apply for bail afresh.

(c) He shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the Court.