AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
1 paragraphs · 126 wordsL.S. Jackson, J.—We think that the decision of the Lower Appellate Court, in this case, is quite correct. A co-sharer in landed property has no right to do any thing which alters the condition of the joint property without the consent of his co-sharers. If he thinks his interest in the property might be improved by works of a particular character, he can effect a partition and improve his particular share. It seems, in this case, the plaintiff interposed when the defendant commenced the infringement of his (plaintiff''s) rights. The suit was reasonable, and the Judge was quite right to order the removal of the materials of the building and the building itself, as far as it had gone. The special appeal is dismissed with costs.
