AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
20 paragraphs · 410 wordsGurvinder Singh Gill, J
The petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in a case registered vide FIR No.251, dated 16.11.2018, Police Station Sangat, District Bathinda,
under Sections 61 and 78 of the Punjab Excise Act, 1914.
The FIR was lodged pursuant to receipt of a secret information that a vehicle was lying abandoned in an accidental condition in which there was
illicit liquor. Upon receipt of said information the police went to the spot and recovered 156 bottles of country-made liquor (Shahnai) meant to be sold
in State of Haryana.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he is neither named in the FIR nor was even arrested from any place near the place from
where the vehicle was recovered from which the recovery of 156 bottles of country-made liquor is stated to have been effected, and is now sought to
be nominated as an accused after about 1 year and 9 months of lodging of the FIR on the ground that he had purchased the car in question from one
Gurpreet, who had further purchased the same from the original owner namely Damodar Shastri.
Opposing the petition, the learned State counsel has submitted that since during the course of investigation it had been found that the petitioner had
purchased the car in question, his complicity is clearly evident. The learned State counsel has, however, informed that the petitioner is not involved in
any other case.
I have considered rival submissions addressed before this Court.
Keeping in view the fact that the petitioner is sought to be nominated as an accused on account of the fact that the police claims that he is owner of
the car in question which in fact stands registered in the name of Damodar Shastri, which would in fact be debatable as the authenticity of the
documents of purchase by the petitioner is yet to be established and while also keeping in view the fact that the petitioner is not stated to be involved in
any other case, the petition is accepted and it is ordered that, in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal
bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called
upon to do so and cooperate with the Arresting/Investigating Officer and shall abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.
