AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
4 paragraphs · 125 wordsP.C. Verma, J.—Heard Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and learned standing counsel.
The grievance of the Petitioner is that he applied for grant of Arm licence before the Respondents and his application dated 24.9.1999 (Annexure No. 1) has not yet been decided.
The licensing authority is required to pass appropriate orders on the application for grant of licence in view of the provisions of the Arms Act, within a reasonable distance of time.
The writ petition is finally disposed of with a direction that the licensing authority (District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar) shall pass appropriate orders according to law on die application of the Petitioner.within a period of three months fronfthe date of certified copy of this order is produced before him.
