High CourtsSingle Bench

Gyanmal vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 29 May 2024 · Citation: (2024) 05 RAJ CK 0152

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kuldeep Mathur, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6081 Of 2024

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 137 words

Kuldeep Mathur, J

This anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.71/2024, registered at Police Station Amet, District Rajsamand, for the offences under Sections 436 and 504 of IPC.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor.

Looking to the nature of allegations levelled against the petitioner in the FIR, this Court is not inclined to grant indulgence of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

However, keeping in mind the provisions contained in Section 41A Cr.P.C., the Investigating Officer shall not effect the arrest in routine manner and before effecting the arrest, the Investigating Officer shall issue a prior notice to the petitioner under Section 41A Cr.P.C.

With the aforesaid direction, the criminal misc. bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is disposed of.