High CourtsSingle Bench

Hafizur Rahman vs State Of Meghalaya & Anr

Meghalaya High Court · Decided on 26 November 2025 · Citation: (2025) 11 MEG CK 1824

HON’BLE JUDGES
W. Diengdoh, J
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 53 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 91 words

W. Diengdoh, J

Mr. R. Gurung, learned GA on behalf of the State respondent has submitted that he has not been able to get specific instructions from the Investigating Officer as far as the status of the charge sheet is concerned. It is prayed that some accommodation may be granted in this regard and the relevant report will be furnished on the next date.

Mr. A. Paramanik, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the prayer made.

Accordingly, as prayed for, list this matter for further hearing on 02.12.2025.