AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
11 paragraphs · 229 wordsHeard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent. Certain developments after passing of the last order on 23.12.2021
have been brought on record by the petitioner by filing an affidavit. From the submissions, it appears that the petitioner is further aggrieved by
rejection of a large part of his claim for incentives on the ground that the claim is not in accordance with the provisions of the Interconnect
Agreement. On this issue, respondent should file a detailed reply as well as reply to the affidavit disclosing which provisions stand in the way of the
petitioner's claim, which have not been accepted. This should be done within two weeks. The other issues including the petitioner’s desire to
have a new agreement as per respondent’s RIO should also be addressed by the respondent in accordance with law without any delay.
Petitioner, if required, may file a rejoinder within two weeks from the receipt of a copy of the reply.
On the next date the issue of incentives shall be dealt with so that if possible, this petition may be disposed of finally leaving other unresolved issues, to
be raised in future, if so required.
Petitioner must be careful and ensure that it continues to pay the invoices for the months of November and December, 2021 without any delay.
Post the matter under the same head on 10.3.2022.Â
