High CourtsDivision Bench

Hammakke Hengsu vs Kochappa Rai

Madras High Court · Decided on 11 February 1919 · Citation: 52 Ind. Cas. 631 : (1919) 10 LW 200

HON’BLE JUDGES
Phillips, J · Bakewell, J

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 112 words
1.

The plaint claims a specific sum as a half share of the profits of land, and does not pray for an account of profits. No issue was raised as to the amount of profits, and apparently they are a fixed sum and probably, therefore, consist of rent. It must be taken, from the course of the proceedings, that the suit was properly framed and that an account was unnecessary to ascertain the profits of the land. The suit, therefore, does not fall within the Provincial Small Cause Court Act, Article 31, and is of a small cause nature and no second appeal lies.

2.

The second appeal is dismissed with costs.