High CourtsDivision Bench

Hansari Sabaiah vs Bhalchander Rao

Andhra Pradesh High Court · Decided on 19 February 1952 · Citation: AIR 1953 AP 243

HON’BLE JUDGES
Suryanarayana Roa, J · Palnitkar, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Misc. Case No. 127/5 of 1951-52
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 159 words
1.

This is a petition for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari against the order of the Additional Collector. The short point for decision is whether a review lies against the order passed by the said Authority in the exercise of his appellate powers. Under Rule 9 of the House Rent Control Order an appeal can be filed against the order of the Rent Controller before, the Collector. There is no provision in the said Rent Control Order for entertaining a review. The remedy of review must specifically be provided for, and as there is no provision for review in the House Rent Control Order, the review cannot lie. We are of the opinion that the order passed by the Additional Collector in review, is without jurisdiction. Moreover, there were no fresh grounds for entertaining the review. We accept this Writ Petition and quash the order passed by the Additional Collector. His original order dated 7-5-1951 will stand.